Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BackgroundDirect-acting antivirals are successful in curing hepatitis C virus infection in more than 95% of patients treated for 12 weeks, but they are expensive. Shortened treatment durations, which may have lower cure rates, have been proposed to reduce costs.ObjectivesTo evaluate the lifetime cost-effectiveness of different shortened treatment durations for genotype 1 noncirrhotic treatment-naive patients.MethodsAssuming a UK National Health Service perspective, we used a probabilistic decision tree and Markov model to compare 3 unstratified shortened treatment durations (8, 6, and 4 weeks) against a standard 12-week treatment duration. Patients failing shortened first-line treatment were re-treated with a 12-week treatment regimen. Parameter inputs were taken from published studies.ResultsThe 8-week treatment duration had an expected incremental net monetary benefit of £7737 (95% confidence interval £3242-£11 819) versus the standard 12-week treatment, per 1000 patients. The 6-week treatment had a positive incremental net monetary benefit, although some uncertainty was observed. The probability that the 8- and 6-week treatments were the most cost-effective was 56% and 25%, respectively, whereas that for the 4-week treatment was 17%. Results were generally robust to sensitivity analyses, including a threshold analysis that showed that the 8-week treatment was the most cost-effective at all drug prices lower than £40 000 per 12-week course.ConclusionsShortening treatments licensed for 12 weeks to 8 weeks is cost-effective in genotype 1 noncirrhotic treatment-naive patients. There was considerable uncertainty in the estimates for 6- and 4-week treatments, with some indication that the 6-week treatment may be cost-effective.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.jval.2018.12.011

Type

Journal article

Journal

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research

Publication Date

06/2019

Volume

22

Pages

693 - 703

Addresses

Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK. Electronic address: c.fawsitt@bristol.ac.uk.

Keywords

STOP-HCV Consortium, Humans, Hepacivirus, Hepatitis C, Chronic, Sulfonamides, Carbamates, Macrocyclic Compounds, Antiviral Agents, Markov Chains, Decision Trees, Cost-Benefit Analysis, State Medicine, Sofosbuvir, United Kingdom, Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings